[fuzzing] Commercial Fuzzer and Open-source Fuzzer comparison

[Ari Takanen]

I completely agree. And they keep on finding problems unless people
see the problem with them, and upgrade to something more effective.
Use of 10 bad fuzzers will result in each of them finding new issues
that the others cannot find. The problem is that as long as someone is
using one bad fuzzer, they rarely look at anything else.

Maybe I shoud have said: "It is sad to see that so many companies
depend on those dumb fuzzers, and do not even know the quality of the
fuzzing they do."

/Ari

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:31:13PM +0200, Thierry Zoller wrote:
> 
> >It is sad to see that those dumb fuzzers are still widely
> >used.
> I digress, it's sad to see those dumb fuzzers are still finding
> bugs, after the product went live. That's sad.
> 
> -- 
> http://blog.zoller.lu
> Thierry Zoller

-- 
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
Ari Takanen                       Codenomicon Ltd.
ari.takanen at codenomicon.com       Tutkijantie 4E
tel: +358-40 50 67678             FI-90570 Oulu
http://www.codenomicon.com        Finland
PGP: http://www.codenomicon.com/codenomicon-key.asc
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-