[fuzzing] Hey all

[Gadi Evron]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, eugaaa wrote:
> Famous last words.
> ;-)

Going with a proposal to SANS? :)

>
> On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 04:02 -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, eugaaa wrote:
>>> On the other hand, an official certification would mean widespread
>>> acceptance as it would instantaneously have become an industry standard.
>>> A distasteful but effective idea :<
>>
>> QA Security Engineer.
>>
>> If fuzzing becomes wide-spread in corporate enviroments, you could expect
>> that. Vendors may also do that. I explored that option in my "corporate
>> fuzzing" lecture back in 23C3.
>>
>> Honestly though, I don't see any widespread acceptance.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 02:36 +0100, Joxean Koret wrote:
>>>> Hi Sergio,
>>>>
>>>> With "research" I mean "vulnerability research". How to find
>>>> vulnerabilities, highlight error prone vulnerable areas, etc...
>>>>
>>>> I'm not a certifications fan so don't consider it a cert's defense, just
>>>> my opinion regarding "certification in fuzzing".
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Joxean Koret
>>>>
>>>> On sáb, 2008-03-15 at 02:21 +0100, Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "certification in research"...sweet!....what about certifications for
>>>>> intelligence and IQ? ;)
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fuzzing mailing list
>>>> fuzzing at whitestar.linuxbox.org
>>>> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/fuzzing
>>>
>>>
>
>