[fuzzing] Hey all

[Gadi Evron]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, eugaaa wrote:
> On the other hand, an official certification would mean widespread
> acceptance as it would instantaneously have become an industry standard.
> A distasteful but effective idea :<

QA Security Engineer.

If fuzzing becomes wide-spread in corporate enviroments, you could expect 
that. Vendors may also do that. I explored that option in my "corporate 
fuzzing" lecture back in 23C3.

Honestly though, I don't see any widespread acceptance.


>
> On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 02:36 +0100, Joxean Koret wrote:
>> Hi Sergio,
>>
>> With "research" I mean "vulnerability research". How to find
>> vulnerabilities, highlight error prone vulnerable areas, etc...
>>
>> I'm not a certifications fan so don't consider it a cert's defense, just
>> my opinion regarding "certification in fuzzing".
>>
>> Regards,
>> Joxean Koret
>>
>> On sáb, 2008-03-15 at 02:21 +0100, Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "certification in research"...sweet!....what about certifications for
>>> intelligence and IQ? ;)
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fuzzing mailing list
>> fuzzing at whitestar.linuxbox.org
>> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/fuzzing
>
>