[fuzzing] I have a dream
Jared DeMott
demottja at msu.edu
Thu Mar 29 10:06:44 CDT 2007
Jerome Athias wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I think that we often discuss repeatdly the same things on this list.
> It is interesting to collect ideas of all the members, but it seems, for
> me, that anybody works also alone on this subject
> Since it's difficult sometimes to have to select the best resources, the
> best ideas, ... i think about to have only one board to collect and
> select all these things
>
> "I have a dream..." of a single door to enter in the best and most
> complete, reliable library on the subject.
>
Yes that would be a good thing. http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Fuzzing
is a decent page. The Wikipedia on fuzzing isn't that great. Both are
incomplete and don't include any tool analysis. Which tools got links
seems fairly random too. A more complete work is required. Intro for
newbies would probably be nice too. Online resources are the best for
up-to-date information and presenting the raw data + links. However,
books can be better at explaining and covering an entire discipline such
as fuzzing. Particularly if a resource is needed for an academic
setting like a college course.
I believe there are three Fuzzing books in the making.
Sutten/Green/Amini, Gadi Evron I think is writing one, and
Takanen/DeMott are writing one. I believe they're all going to come out
before the end of this year. (I only know the details of one of those
three! :) )
> I know that there is a lot of available resources, websites, tools, etc
> on fuzzing.
> Could it be possible to gather them on a wiki for example? I think so.
>
> I let you think about this and wait for your feedbacks.
>
> A place for this could be the open-online Metasploit book wiki:
> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Metasploit
>
> Regards,
> /JA
> _______________________________________________
> fuzzing mailing list
> fuzzing at whitestar.linuxbox.org
> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/fuzzing
>
>
>
More information about the fuzzing
mailing list